Watches
Submariner 126610LV: Review Configuration Context
Newer black-dial, green-bezel Submariner Date design; visual correspondence in Review 006, not an authenticated reference engraving.
- Page updated
- Last verified
Reference snapshot
- Reference code
- 126610LV
Key facts
| Field | Value | Assertion nature | Editorial verification | Source type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| identity.review_design | Newer black-dial, green-bezel Submariner Date design corresponds visually to 126610LV in Review 006. Editorial design identification only; no authenticated reference engraving or measured case size. | REPORTED | CONFIRMED | VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT |
Detailed review
Newer black-dial, green-bezel Submariner Date design; visual correspondence in Review 006, not an authenticated reference engraving.
Review 006 compares reviewer-attributed VSF and Clean Submariner samples. The author distinguishes pearl appearance, metal bezel profile and clasp codes from unmeasured reserve and supplier claims. All shown configurations have a date window and Cyclops magnifier. The source uses informal model-generation language and VSF V1/V2 labels; these do not establish a production date or a universal movement specification.
The supplied English text ends at 10:40.940, before the full video ends. Reference identification is limited to the visible design and source context.
Factory versions
Factory versions
Clean Submariner — Review 006 Configuration
Newer black-dial green-bezel 126610LV-style comparison sample; reviewer-attributed Shanghai 3235, exact variant unknown.
Factory versions
VSF Submariner V2 — Review 006 Attribution
Newer black-dial green-bezel 126610LV-style sample, revised pearl; reviewer-attributed Dandong 3235.
Factories
Factories
Clean Factory: GMT Review Evidence
Clean Factory terminology and the scope of the evidence in Review 001.
Factories
VS Factory: Pepsi GMT Review Evidence
VS Factory / VSF terminology and the source limits of the Pepsi GMT review.
Movements
Movements
Shanghai 3235: Clean Review Attribution
Clean newer-generation movement called Shanghai 3235 by the reviewer; exact SH/VR variant is not established.
Movements
Dandong 3235 / VS3235: Review Attribution
VSF newer-generation movement attributed by the reviewer to Dandong 3235; the stated reserve is not a timed test.
Reviews
Reviews
VSF Starbucks Identification: Dial Recess, 6X and Bezel Feel
I inspect a VSF-attributed Starbucks dial recess, reported 6X prefix and bezel action, separating visible sample details from factory and DD3235 claims.
Reviews
VSF vs Clean Submariner Review: Bezel Pearls, 3235 Claims and Clasp Codes
VSF vs Clean Submariner comparison: revised bezel pearls, metal bezel profiles, attributed 3235 movements, clasp codes and sample-specific QC limits.
Reviews
VSF Starbucks: My Sample Weight, Clasp and Bezel Check
I record a VSF Starbucks at 157.78 g with its bracelet, inspect the clasp and explain why the ten-click footage is a bezel check, not a Glidelock test.
Reviews
VSF Starbucks: My Open-Caseback DD3235 Inspection
I inspect my VSF Starbucks movement and weigh its detached caseback, separating visible DD3235 clues from my bearing, engraving and colour assessments.
Reviews
VSF Starbucks: My Caliper and Clasp Lettering Check
I record 157.14 g on my Starbucks sample, examine a reported 40.5 mm caliper span and inspect clasp lettering and E7Y, explaining each identification limit.
QC observations
No reviewed coverage yet.
Known / reported issues
No reviewed coverage yet.
Comparisons
No reviewed coverage yet.
Customer Stories
No reviewed coverage yet.
Current status
Review 006 source scope. Recording year and exact manufacturing batch remain unconfirmed.
Sources & provenance
Evidence coverage: 14
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:00,320–00:00:08,710
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:02:21,540–00:02:27,780
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:03:46,680–00:03:56,620
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:04:47,680–00:04:52,600
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:04:52,980–00:04:58,400
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:05:15,100–00:05:22,480
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:06:23,540–00:06:27,420
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:06:57,280–00:06:59,380
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:07:33,120–00:07:41,600
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:08:16,560–00:08:21,280
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:08:42,400–00:08:47,440
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:09:31,240–00:09:43,000
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:02,120–00:00:07,890
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:02,150–00:00:08,790
Update history
This section has no approved content yet.
Ask an Expert
Ask an Expert
Choose a version or continue with this research page.