Movements
Shanghai 3235: Clean Review Attribution
Clean newer-generation movement called Shanghai 3235 by the reviewer; exact SH/VR variant is not established.
- Page updated
- Last verified
Key facts
| Field | Value | Assertion nature | Editorial verification | Source type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| reserve.reviewer_claim | Approximately 42 hours is a spoken reserve claim, not a timed run-down result. | CLAIMED | CONFIRMED | VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT |
Detailed review
Clean newer-generation movement called Shanghai 3235 by the reviewer; exact SH/VR variant is not established.
Review 006 reports the narrator's movement attribution for the newer Submariner generation. He states approximately 72 hours for Dandong and 42 hours for Shanghai. These are spoken reserve figures, not measured results.
The text-covered comparison does not establish manufacturing origin, exact architecture, parts compatibility or long-term reliability. The original video contains later movement footage beyond the supplied English text; this page does not authenticate that sequence. A genuine Rolex calibre specification cannot establish the performance of a replica movement. Ask for documentation and condition evidence for the exact sample.
Factory versions
Factory versions
Clean Submariner — Review 006 Configuration
Newer black-dial green-bezel 126610LV-style comparison sample; reviewer-attributed Shanghai 3235, exact variant unknown.
Watches
Watches
Submariner 126610LV: Review Configuration Context
Newer black-dial, green-bezel Submariner Date design; visual correspondence in Review 006, not an authenticated reference engraving.
Factories
Factories
Clean Factory: GMT Review Evidence
Clean Factory terminology and the scope of the evidence in Review 001.
Reviews
Reviews
VSF vs Clean Submariner Review: Bezel Pearls, 3235 Claims and Clasp Codes
VSF vs Clean Submariner comparison: revised bezel pearls, metal bezel profiles, attributed 3235 movements, clasp codes and sample-specific QC limits.
Current status
Review 006 source scope. Recording year and exact manufacturing batch remain unconfirmed.
Sources & provenance
Evidence coverage: 14
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:00,320–00:00:08,710
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:02:21,540–00:02:27,780
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:03:46,680–00:03:56,620
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:04:47,680–00:04:52,600
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:04:52,980–00:04:58,400
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:05:15,100–00:05:22,480
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:06:23,540–00:06:27,420
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:06:57,280–00:06:59,380
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:07:33,120–00:07:41,600
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:08:16,560–00:08:21,280
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:08:42,400–00:08:47,440
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:09:31,240–00:09:43,000
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:02,120–00:00:07,890
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:02,150–00:00:08,790
Update history
This section has no approved content yet.