VSF WATCH
Search
English
Ask an Expert

Reviews

Clean Factory GMT-Master II Review: Bruce Wayne, Pepsi V3, Batman and Two-Tone GRNR

Clean GMT-Master II review covering Bruce Wayne, Pepsi V3, Batman and two-tone GRNR, with UV bezel evidence, DD3285 inspection and sample-specific QC questions.

Review date
Unknown
Page updated
Last verified

Verification applies only to the listed facts and explicit review scope.

On this page

Original video

Video chapters

Key facts

Key facts
FieldValueAssertion natureEditorial verificationSource type
movement.identificationDD3285 is the reviewer identification of the opened grey/black sample; the other three movements are not individually opened. CLAIMEDCONFIRMEDVIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT
function.local_hourIndependent local-hour adjustment and date change are shown on the grey/black sample. OBSERVEDCONFIRMEDVIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT
identity.referencesVisible configurations correspond to 126710GRNR, 126710BLRO, 126710BLNR and 126713GRNR designs. OBSERVEDCORRECTEDVIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT
bezel.uv_responseThe normally blue Pepsi insert portion shows a red shift during the UV sequence. OBSERVEDCONFIRMEDVIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT

Detailed review

Review scope and strongest evidence

The strongest evidence in this Clean Factory GMT-Master II review comes from three sequences: a UV-light check of the red-and-blue Pepsi insert, a demonstration of the grey-and-black model's independent local-hour adjustment, and an open-caseback inspection of the movement identified by the reviewer as a Dandong 3285. Together, they provide a more useful basis for evaluating these samples than a factory sticker or a “V3” label alone.

The four watches are replica interpretations of Rolex designs, not genuine Rolex watches. This article examines the supplied 7-minute-19-second review and its English transcript. Reference numbers below identify the corresponding Rolex designs from their visible configurations; they do not authenticate the samples or establish their manufacturing origin. The original recording date is unconfirmed, so statements about the “latest” version or factory exclusivity are treated as the reviewer's historical assessment.

Key takeaways

- The lineup corresponds to the 126710GRNR grey-and-black “Bruce Wayne,” 126710BLRO red-and-blue “Pepsi,” 126710BLNR blue-and-black “Batman,” and yellow-tone two-tone 126713GRNR.
- The English subtitles call the Pepsi “Coke” and the two-tone GRNR “Root Beer.” The visible watches support correcting both labels.
- The reviewer identifies the movements as DD3285. Only the grey-and-black sample receives the detailed open-caseback inspection in this review.
- The Pepsi UV sequence is useful sample evidence, but neither fluorescence nor a version label independently establishes factory origin.
- No timed power-reserve run, timegrapher results, water-pressure test or long-term reliability study is supplied.

Which four GMT-Master II designs are shown?

126710GRNR — Bruce Wayne: Grey/black bezel, green GMT hand and steel-tone case; Jubilee-style bracelet in Review 001.

126710BLRO — Pepsi: Red/blue bezel and steel-tone case; Jubilee-style bracelet in Review 001.

126710BLNR — Batman: Blue/black bezel and steel-tone case; Oyster-style bracelet in Review 001.

126713GRNR — Two-Tone GRNR: Grey/black bezel with yellow-tone two-tone case and Jubilee-style bracelet in Review 001.

These mappings are consistent with Rolex's own descriptions of the 126710GRNR, 126710BLRO, 126710BLNR and 126713GRNR. Those manufacturer sources describe genuine watches. Their material specifications, tolerances and certifications must not be transferred to these replica samples.

The steel grey/black configuration also fits the reviewer's reference to a 2024 introduction. Rolex's 2024 GMT-Master II brochure identifies the steel 126710GRNR with its green 24-hour hand. This establishes the design context, not the date the review was filmed.

Pepsi V3: what the UV sequence establishes

At 00:29–00:47, the reviewer directs a UV light at the Pepsi insert. The footage shows a red shift in the normally blue portion while the reviewer describes both halves as becoming red. He presents this as a distinguishing feature of the version he calls V3, following earlier V1, V2 and V2S iterations.

That is a useful observation about this particular insert under the recording's lighting conditions. It does not establish ceramic composition, factory provenance or a measured colour match to a genuine insert. No controlled side-by-side genuine comparison is provided.

Version terminology needs particular care. A September 2024 RepTime discussion about identifying a Clean Pepsi V3 contains disagreement over V2, V3 and V3s naming and questions about how the UV test should look. This is community context, not a factory specification. For a buying enquiry, the practical question is which insert and movement the actual offered watch has, supported by current photographs and a demonstration, rather than whether the listing contains “V3.”

The reviewer's claim that this insert costs more than the other colourways is an attributed pricing assessment. The video supplies no invoice or cost breakdown, so it cannot establish a current market premium.

Bruce Wayne: bezel action, dial details and bracelet adjustment

The grey-and-black sample receives most of the close inspection. At 02:14–02:45, the reviewer discusses dial printing, rehaut engraving, crystal clarity, case finishing and the clasp. He is strongly positive about their execution. These are his inspection judgments; the recording does not supply dimensional measurements or a comprehensive genuine comparison that would justify describing the watch as “perfect.”

At 02:47–03:06, he demonstrates the folding bracelet extension and describes three tool-adjusted positions inside the clasp, separately from sizing by removing screw-fastened links. The distinction matters: the comfort extension, clasp micro-adjustment and link removal serve different fitting needs. A measured extension length for this replica is not supplied.

The transcript calls F6U a serial number while the discussion is focused on the clasp. It is better treated here as a reported clasp marking, not a unique watch serial or proof of factory identity. Community discussion about F6U markings illustrates why collectors should not rely on the code alone: contributors associate it with more than one factory label. Those comments are not independent supply-chain verification.

At 03:39–04:12, the reviewer evaluates the grey/black colour boundary, bezel detent feel, green GMT hand, dial lettering and date/Cyclops alignment. He describes the bezel action as crisper than earlier Clean examples he has handled. That tactile comparison is useful expert commentary, but the footage cannot let the reader feel the resistance or quantify its consistency across a batch.

DD3285: the setting demonstration and caseback inspection

At 04:18–04:28, the grey-and-black watch is shown with its local hour hand being adjusted while the minute hand remains in place; the date changes as the local time is advanced. This is the most practically informative functional sequence in the review.

The transcript's “two full rotations” should be understood in terms of the local hour hand completing a 24-hour cycle, not as an instruction to turn the crown exactly twice. The independent local-hour function is also described for the genuine model in Rolex's GMT-Master II documentation. Similar setting behaviour does not prove identical internal construction.

At 05:45–06:48, the caseback of the grey-and-black sample is opened. The movement, rotor and balance area are visible, and the reviewer identifies the movement as the Dandong 3285, commonly abbreviated DD3285. He points out the balance bridge and explains the rate and beat-error adjustment controls in the orientation shown.

That explanation belongs in the review as attributed technical commentary. It is not a regulation test: no before-and-after readings are supplied. The close-up is also insufficient to establish complete parts interchangeability with Rolex calibre 3285. The subtitle's “1:1 clone” and “unbeatable” language therefore should not be read as verified engineering conclusions.

At 05:35–05:41, the reviewer says the four models share the same movement. That remains his statement about the lineup; the recording does not individually open and verify all four watches. His favourable comments on power reserve and stability are similarly unaccompanied by measured results. No exact reserve figure should be assigned to these samples from this review.

Clean versus ARF: useful comparison, limited scope

At 03:12–03:33, the reviewer compares the grey-and-black Clean with an ARF version he reviewed previously. He describes their exterior components as very similar, identifies the ARF movement as a Shanghai 3285 clone, and explains his preference for Clean in terms of the Dandong movement. He also regards the ARF as a value option.

The movement description and shared-component suggestion are his account of those versions. There is no side-by-side teardown, supplier documentation or reliability dataset here. It would be inaccurate to turn this passage into a permanent rule that all ARF GMTs use one movement or all Clean GMTs are superior.

The disagreement is visible in a March 2025 Clean-versus-ARF discussion, where contributors weigh crystal appearance, price and perceived movement quality differently. A later Bruce Wayne comparison discussion also contains claims about different movement offerings. These posts help frame the questions to ask; they do not verify a particular watch's configuration or justify a current exclusivity claim.

What to request in sample-specific QC

The review suggests a focused inspection rather than a universal factory ranking:

1. Identify the configuration: confirm bezel colours, hand colour, bracelet style and corresponding reference design.
2. Inspect the offered watch: request straight-on dial and date photographs, rehaut views, bezel alignment and bracelet/end-link views. The reviewer's favourable sample does not guarantee another sample's alignment.
3. Clarify the version: for a Pepsi sold as V3, request the actual insert specification and a UV demonstration with the lighting conditions stated.
4. Check GMT operation: request a short demonstration of independent local-hour adjustment and date change, plus a clear movement view if movement identity is part of the offer.
5. Separate measurements from claims: ask for actual timegrapher readings, a timed power-reserve result or a pressure-test record when those properties matter. None is established by this review.

For the two-tone 126713GRNR, colour and finish deserve their own discussion. An April 2024 community thread raises questions about yellow tone and plating durability, with conflicting responses. This review provides a visual introduction and the reviewer's styling preference, not a plating-thickness measurement or wear test.

Sources & provenance

Strengths

Useful first-hand evidence includes the Pepsi UV sequence, local-hour/date operation, bracelet extension and an opened grey/black sample.

What to watch for

Reference translations required correction. Factory and movement origins remain reviewer attributions. No pressure, timed reserve or timegrapher test is supplied.

Movement summary

Reviewer-attributed DD3285; the grey/black sample is opened. The claim that all four share this movement is not individually verified internally.

Questions answered

Is the red-and-blue watch a Coke or a Pepsi?

It is the Pepsi configuration, corresponding to the 126710BLRO design. “Coke” in the English transcript is a translation error for the visible red-and-blue watch.

Is the two-tone watch a Root Beer?

The visible yellow-tone case and bracelet with a grey-and-black bezel correspond to the two-tone 126713GRNR design. The transcript's Root Beer label should not be used to identify this sample.

Does this review confirm DD3285 movements in all four watches?

The reviewer says all four share the movement. The detailed open-caseback inspection is of the grey-and-black sample, which he identifies as DD3285. The other three are not individually verified internally in this recording.

Does a red UV response prove that a Pepsi is Clean V3?

No. The response is one observed feature of the reviewed insert. It is not, by itself, proof of a factory, complete-watch version or manufacturing origin.

Is Clean conclusively better than ARF?

This reviewer prefers the Dandong-equipped Clean version he discusses, while acknowledging ARF's value. The review does not establish a universal or current ranking across all versions.

What power reserve and water resistance were measured?

Neither was measured in the supplied review. Genuine Rolex specifications and advertised replica specifications should not be substituted for sample test results.

Transcript

Factory attribution and four-model lineup 00:00:02,120–00:00:07,890

In this review, I'll introduce the four best-selling models in the GMT-Master series from Clean Factory.

Source type

Pepsi insert UV demonstration 00:00:29,200–00:00:34,690

First, after turning off the lights, use a UV light to illuminate the bezel insert.

Source type

Bracelet extension and clasp adjustment 00:02:47,060–00:02:49,080

The clasp here has a folding extension.

Source type

Independent local-hour adjustment 00:04:18,220–00:04:21,500

Pull out to the first position. The date is changed via the hour hand. See?

Source type

Open-caseback movement identification 00:05:45,950–00:05:47,380

Let's open the new model.

Source type

Factory versions

Watches

Factories

Movements

Current status

Review 001 editorial verification complete. Original recording date and exact batch dates remain unconfirmed.

Sources & provenance

Evidence coverage: 9

  • VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:02,120–00:00:07,890
  • VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:29,200–00:00:34,690
  • VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:02:47,060–00:02:49,080
  • VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:04:18,220–00:04:21,500
  • VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:05:45,950–00:05:47,380
  • MANUFACTURER_DOCUMENTATION · EXTERNAL · CONFIRMED
  • MANUFACTURER_DOCUMENTATION · EXTERNAL · CONFIRMED
  • MANUFACTURER_DOCUMENTATION · EXTERNAL · CONFIRMED
  • MANUFACTURER_DOCUMENTATION · EXTERNAL · CONFIRMED

VSF WATCH Editorial · Methodology · Corrections

Update history

This section has no approved content yet.

Ask an Expert

Ask about this GMT configuration
WhatsApp