Watches
Submariner 116610LN: Review Configuration Context
Older black-dial, black-bezel Submariner Date design; visual correspondence in Review 006, not an authenticated reference engraving.
- Page updated
- Last verified
Reference snapshot
- Reference code
- 116610LN
Key facts
| Field | Value | Assertion nature | Editorial verification | Source type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| identity.review_design | Older black-dial, black-bezel Submariner Date design corresponds visually to 116610LN in Review 006. Editorial design identification only; no authenticated reference engraving or measured case size. | REPORTED | CONFIRMED | VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT |
Detailed review
Older black-dial, black-bezel Submariner Date design; visual correspondence in Review 006, not an authenticated reference engraving.
Review 006 compares reviewer-attributed VSF and Clean Submariner samples. The author distinguishes pearl appearance, metal bezel profile and clasp codes from unmeasured reserve and supplier claims. All shown configurations have a date window and Cyclops magnifier. The source uses informal model-generation language and VSF V1/V2 labels; these do not establish a production date or a universal movement specification.
The supplied English text ends at 10:40.940, before the full video ends. Reference identification is limited to the visible design and source context.
Factory versions
No reviewed coverage yet.
Factories
No reviewed coverage yet.
Movements
No reviewed coverage yet.
Reviews
Reviews
VSF vs Clean Submariner Review: Bezel Pearls, 3235 Claims and Clasp Codes
VSF vs Clean Submariner comparison: revised bezel pearls, metal bezel profiles, attributed 3235 movements, clasp codes and sample-specific QC limits.
QC observations
No reviewed coverage yet.
Known / reported issues
No reviewed coverage yet.
Comparisons
No reviewed coverage yet.
Customer Stories
No reviewed coverage yet.
Current status
Review 006 source scope. Recording year and exact manufacturing batch remain unconfirmed.
Sources & provenance
Evidence coverage: 14
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:00,320–00:00:08,710
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:02:21,540–00:02:27,780
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:03:46,680–00:03:56,620
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:04:47,680–00:04:52,600
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:04:52,980–00:04:58,400
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:05:15,100–00:05:22,480
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:06:23,540–00:06:27,420
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:06:57,280–00:06:59,380
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:07:33,120–00:07:41,600
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:08:16,560–00:08:21,280
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:08:42,400–00:08:47,440
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:09:31,240–00:09:43,000
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:02,120–00:00:07,890
- VIDEO_AND_TRANSCRIPT · FIRST_PARTY · CONFIRMED 00:00:02,150–00:00:08,790
Update history
This section has no approved content yet.